DATE
4/6/25
TIME
11:50 PM
Written by
Xiaoxin Sun
LOCATION
Oakland, CA
《Mickey 17》by Bong Joon Ho

DATE
4/6/25
TIME
11:50 PM
Written by
Xiaoxin Sun
LOCATION
Oakland, CA
《Mickey 17》by Bong Joon Ho

DATE
4/6/25
TIME
11:50 PM
Written by
Xiaoxin Sun
LOCATION
Oakland, CA
《Mickey 17》by Bong Joon Ho

2019年的时候,在洛杉矶the grove的amc和大学同学一起看的《寄生虫》,看完之后居然大家起立鼓掌。当时我也想鼓掌,因为我真的没有想到奉俊昊还会这种。
当时我只看了他的《杀人回忆》和《okja》。19年之前,我都没听过奉俊昊,还是在拍戏的时候、中午大家在剧组食堂吃饭、聊起自己喜欢的导演,某挺可爱的视效制片人说之前和奉俊昊合作拍过,她很喜欢奉俊昊。大家也纷纷点头确实不错,作品也不错。好像除了我,所有人都看过他的《杀人回忆》。我感到自己是不是没做什么该做的事,我是不是太没文化了?只好偷偷摸摸下班去看,看完觉得:就这?大家在惊艳什么?拍的真的挺粗糙的、剧本感觉也很模糊、很多镜头感觉都不是那么的确定,我感觉这人都没想明白要拍啥,就招呼一大堆人开始拍了。唯一感觉到的就是导演的野蛮生长力,粗糙原始、直接。“这就是我想拍的、好奇的、想说的,虽然没想明白、但就这么拍、怎么了”,大概这种内心os。事实证明,有时候原始的可能是最好的。
看《okja》是因为刚好在netflix上了,而且小女孩的演技很好、开头那段okja和女孩的视效做得很好、也很抓人,就看完了。看完也觉得虎头蛇尾,刚开始好像很搞笑、很有趣、很多hook,到了中后段多少有点没接上前面的矛盾深度,最后的结尾虽然悲伤、升华了一点点,但也没有很惊艳。我非常可以理解这种虎头蛇尾的创作过程,我也是。刚开始总是很激昂,慢慢到了中后段就开始泄气了、开始厌烦这个主题、想要赶紧收尾。但作为观众,我对这种行为还是有点看法的,谁让我是付费用户呢。
《寄生虫》出来的时候真的没想去看,但看到很多人发朋友圈、还是有点好奇的。然后大学同学有电影票,我就去了。咋说,他这次这个和他一起写的编剧找的真好,哪找来的?感觉跟之前所有的作品的质量突然不一样了,从虎头蛇尾,到了《雷雨》级别的矛盾展现、层层推进、高潮和结局强烈收尾、余音绕梁,宛如交响乐。而且这部电影里面的set design也很好,许多构图简直是《architecture design》杂志里直接出来的。豪宅的色调以黄、木质、绿、植物和蓝、天空为主,很多直线条,非常好构图。而且这个豪宅富人、半地下室居民、和全地下室洞人之间的阶级区别,直接通过物理上的上、中、下体现出来了。打光、服装也有跟上这种豪宅色调,相反半地下室则是深绿色、墨蓝色,而全地下室则是黑色;越往下走越黑。我真有被惊艳到。他是个很鬼才的导演,想法很多、很新颖、执行方式也各种各样,但就是水平太不稳定了。
在斩获奥斯卡、金棕榈等等之后,他的下一部电影《Mickey 17》当然备受关注了。对这部电影我只有一句话可以说:他对死亡的理解,可太肤浅了。还有之前《寄生虫》那个编剧怎么不干了,我还想看。不推荐观看,要是你实在好奇、可以快进看youtube上的剧情简介。不过这里面Naomi Ackie确实挺有个性魅力、帅气的,在《Blink Twice》里就觉得她很有爆发力了,以后也会持续关注。
Back in 2019, I watched Parasite with some college friends at the AMC in The Grove, Los Angeles. To my surprise, people actually stood up and applauded after the screening. I wanted to clap too, because I really didn’t expect that Bong Joon-ho could do this. At the time, I had only seen Memories of Murder and Okja. Before 2019, I hadn’t even heard of Bong Joon-ho.I first came across his name while on set—during lunch in the crew canteen, people were chatting about directors they liked. A pretty adorable VFX producer mentioned she had worked with Bong Joon-ho on a shoot before, and that she really liked him. Everyone else nodded—yeah, he’s great, good body of work. It seemed like everyone except me had seen Memories of Murder. I started wondering if I had missed out on something important. Was I just culturally illiterate? So I secretly watched it after work. After watching it, I thought: that’s it? What’s everyone so blown away by? The filmmaking felt pretty rough, the script kind of vague, and a lot of the shots felt uncertain—like the director hadn’t figured out what he wanted but gathered everyone anyway and just started shooting. The only thing I could sense was this raw, unchecked directorial energy. Primitive, blunt, unfiltered. Something like: “This is what I want to shoot. I’m curious about this. I want to say something, even if I haven’t figured it out yet—so I’ll just shoot. What, you got a problem?” Turns out, sometimes just being raw is the best way to go.
I watched Okja just because it happened to be on Netflix. The little girl’s acting was really good, and the visual effects in the opening scenes between her and Okja were well done and engaging—so I watched the whole thing. But the ending felt abrupt. It started off funny, interesting, full of hooks—but halfway through, the deeper tensions weren’t really carried forward, and the final resolution, while sad and slightly elevated, didn’t blow me away. I completely understand how the creative energy does halfway through the creative process, it happens to me too.The beginning is full of energy, but by the middle, you start to lose steam, get tired of the theme, and want to wrap it up quickly. But as a viewer, I do have opinions about this—after all, I’m the one paying for the content.
When Parasite came out, I honestly didn’t plan to watch it. But so many people were posting about it on social media that I got curious. A college friend had a movie ticket, so I went. What can I say? This time around, the co-writer he found was really good. Where did he find this person? It felt like a whole different level from his previous work. No more anticlimax— this was like Thunderstorm (A Chinese Huaju)-level conflict layering: step-by-step buildup, peak, ending with force, and lingering resonance—like a full-blown symphony. And the set design in this film? Beautiful. Many of the compositions looked like they came straight out of Architecture Design magazine. The rich family’s mansion was dominated by yellows, wood tones, greens (plants), and blues (sky). Lots of clean straight lines—easy to frame well. And the class difference between the rich family, the semi-basement tenants, and the full-basement-dweller was expressed through physical levels: up, middle, down. Lighting and costume design followed suit: the rich family’s palette matched the house—warm, airy. The semi-basement was deep green and inky blue. The full basement was black. The further down you went, the darker it got. I was genuinely impressed. Bong is a highly imaginative director—full of ideas, always trying new things, with diverse ways of executing them. But his delivery is very inconsistent.
So after winning the Oscar, the Palme d’Or, and everything else—of course, his next film Mickey 17 drew a lot of attention. And I have only one thing to say about it: his understanding of death is quite shallow. Also, where did that Parasite co-writer go? I wanted more from them. Not recommended. If you’re really curious, just fast-forward through a YouTube plot summary. That said—Naomi Ackie is pretty charismatic and cool in this. She already had that explosive quality in Blink Twice—definitely someone I’ll keep watching in the future.
Back in 2019, I watched Parasite with some college friends at the AMC in The Grove, Los Angeles. To my surprise, people actually stood up and applauded after the screening. I wanted to clap too, because I really didn’t expect that Bong Joon-ho could do this. At the time, I had only seen Memories of Murder and Okja. Before 2019, I hadn’t even heard of Bong Joon-ho.I first came across his name while on set—during lunch in the crew canteen, people were chatting about directors they liked. A pretty adorable VFX producer mentioned she had worked with Bong Joon-ho on a shoot before, and that she really liked him. Everyone else nodded—yeah, he’s great, good body of work. It seemed like everyone except me had seen Memories of Murder. I started wondering if I had missed out on something important. Was I just culturally illiterate? So I secretly watched it after work. After watching it, I thought: that’s it? What’s everyone so blown away by? The filmmaking felt pretty rough, the script kind of vague, and a lot of the shots felt uncertain—like the director hadn’t figured out what he wanted but gathered everyone anyway and just started shooting. The only thing I could sense was this raw, unchecked directorial energy. Primitive, blunt, unfiltered. Something like: “This is what I want to shoot. I’m curious about this. I want to say something, even if I haven’t figured it out yet—so I’ll just shoot. What, you got a problem?” Turns out, sometimes just being raw is the best way to go.
I watched Okja just because it happened to be on Netflix. The little girl’s acting was really good, and the visual effects in the opening scenes between her and Okja were well done and engaging—so I watched the whole thing. But the ending felt abrupt. It started off funny, interesting, full of hooks—but halfway through, the deeper tensions weren’t really carried forward, and the final resolution, while sad and slightly elevated, didn’t blow me away. I completely understand how the creative energy does halfway through the creative process, it happens to me too.The beginning is full of energy, but by the middle, you start to lose steam, get tired of the theme, and want to wrap it up quickly. But as a viewer, I do have opinions about this—after all, I’m the one paying for the content.
When Parasite came out, I honestly didn’t plan to watch it. But so many people were posting about it on social media that I got curious. A college friend had a movie ticket, so I went. What can I say? This time around, the co-writer he found was really good. Where did he find this person? It felt like a whole different level from his previous work. No more anticlimax— this was like Thunderstorm (A Chinese Huaju)-level conflict layering: step-by-step buildup, peak, ending with force, and lingering resonance—like a full-blown symphony. And the set design in this film? Beautiful. Many of the compositions looked like they came straight out of Architecture Design magazine. The rich family’s mansion was dominated by yellows, wood tones, greens (plants), and blues (sky). Lots of clean straight lines—easy to frame well. And the class difference between the rich family, the semi-basement tenants, and the full-basement-dweller was expressed through physical levels: up, middle, down. Lighting and costume design followed suit: the rich family’s palette matched the house—warm, airy. The semi-basement was deep green and inky blue. The full basement was black. The further down you went, the darker it got. I was genuinely impressed. Bong is a highly imaginative director—full of ideas, always trying new things, with diverse ways of executing them. But his delivery is very inconsistent.
So after winning the Oscar, the Palme d’Or, and everything else—of course, his next film Mickey 17 drew a lot of attention. And I have only one thing to say about it: his understanding of death is quite shallow. Also, where did that Parasite co-writer go? I wanted more from them. Not recommended. If you’re really curious, just fast-forward through a YouTube plot summary. That said—Naomi Ackie is pretty charismatic and cool in this. She already had that explosive quality in Blink Twice—definitely someone I’ll keep watching in the future.
Feel free to share if you find this helpful
Feel free to share if you find this helpful
Feel free to share if you find this helpful